Sunday, March 22, 2015

Not groovin'



Techno Teaching: What Educators Can Learn from DJs at MACUL 2015 was an interesting presentation. And thought provoking.

Presenter Gary Abud described the work of the DJ as someone with a number of complex skills managing many different things at once, responding successful in the moment to contingencies. A DJ creates a compelling environment for clubbers. The DJ can get clubber to dance, put their hands up... you name it. The analogy with teachers is obvious, and a very good one.

While compelling, however, it also has a less attractive side.

The subtext, as I see it, is about creating the “wow” lesson: a flashy, hypnotic, and mesmerizing performance. In this scenario the DJ-teacher alone has agency. The clubbers-students can only respond, only go where they are led. There is only one response.

I think I'd rather have some co-creation. Some back and forth. This DJ stuff shuts down all spontaneity and responsiveness.

And then there's the beat, the DJ beat Abud said was so great... that it's all about how a DJ appropriates another DJ's beat, modifying it... (way too PoMo for me!) Don't tell me there's a person behind it--a machine is the soul of that "beat." In other words, no soul. Why do you Gen Y people and millennials think there's a grove there? There ain't no groove there. This is a groove: Bernard Purdie putsdown a groove on “Home at Last.” 

Or this groove? Nuff said.